Written By Michael Ferrara
Created on 2025-05-06 11:13
Published on 2025-05-08 11:03
“Innovation comes from teams more often than from the lightbulb moments of lone geniuses.” — Walter Isaacson, The Innovators
When most people think about inventors, they imagine a solitary genius scribbling away in a garage. But in the modern tech world, innovation is rarely the product of a lone spark. It's built collaboratively—layer by layer—by teams of engineers, coders, designers, and systems thinkers. Still, our systems of recognition—especially patents—haven’t caught up.
In theory, patents protect intellectual property. In practice, they often function more as legal armor for big companies than as shields for individual inventors. The U.S. shifted from a “first to invent” system to a “first to file” approach in 2011. That seemingly minor change transformed the game, prioritizing legal speed over technical creativity. A lone inventor with a breakthrough but no legal team often loses to the corporation with faster paperwork.
And this isn’t new.
History offers sharp reminders that the people who invent the future are not always the ones who benefit from it.
Nikola Tesla pioneered alternating current (AC), which became the backbone of modern electricity. But it was industrialist George Westinghouse who financed, marketed, and built the infrastructure. Tesla died nearly broke.
Douglas Engelbart unveiled the computer mouse, video conferencing, and hypertext in his visionary “Mother of All Demos” in 1968. But it was Steve Jobs and Bill Gates who turned those innovations into mass-market products. Engelbart’s legacy came decades late.
Tim Berners-Lee built the architecture for the World Wide Web—and gave it away freely. The digital titans that followed—Google, Facebook, Amazon—are built on the back of that open infrastructure, not the inventor himself.
Even in software history, Gary Kildall’s CP/M was an early operating system that could have powered IBM’s first PCs. But a missed meeting left the door open for Bill Gates, who stepped in with MS-DOS—and the rest is history.
And in one of the most famous patent races of all time, Elisha Gray may have invented the telephone, but Alexander Graham Bell got to the patent office first. Timing, not merit, often determines who enters the history books.
These patterns persist today—partly due to widespread misunderstanding of how patents actually work. As outlined in Innovation and Its Discontents by Adam Jaffe and Josh Lerner, the U.S. patent system has become less about protecting creativity and more about protecting corporate leverage. These six myths still haunt inventors today:
“I have an idea, therefore I have a patent.” In reality, patents protect specific mechanisms and processes, not vague product ideas. A smartphone, for instance, is made up of potentially thousands of separate patentable inventions.
“I’ll wait to see if it takes off before filing.” If you showcase or publicly disclose your idea—even under NDA—it can destroy your ability to patent it. In many countries, first public disclosure = forfeited rights.
“Getting a patent means my invention has value.” A patent is just a tool. Without a clear market or product strategy, it may sit unused—or worse, be impossible to enforce.
“All patents are strong.” As Jaffe and Lerner highlight, many patents are too vague or poorly constructed to hold up in court—yet still cost thousands to obtain.
“One patent covers my whole invention.” For anything complex—AI, software, IoT—you often need a portfolio of patents. One startup reportedly filed 1,500 separate patents for a single platform.
“NDAs protect my rights.” They might shield trade secrets, but if you offer something for sale—even with an NDA—you may trigger the public disclosure clock.
The gap is now wider than ever. Generative AI models are now producing ideas, code, and even mechanical designs—some of which are patentable. But can an algorithm be listed as an inventor? And if not, who owns the credit—the engineer, the company, or the machine?
AI systems can now invent by learning from huge collections of technical material. They're trained on things like patent filings, engineering blueprints, scientific papers, and product data. This allows them to understand not just what exists, but what’s missing—identifying opportunities for something new. In a way, they learn the rules of invention by studying everything humans have already tried.
Once trained, they use algorithms to generate solutions. Some mimic evolution, testing variations and improving each round. Others use trial-and-error (like reinforcement learning) to find what works best. They can even mix parts of old inventions into new combinations. What makes these systems powerful isn’t just speed—it’s their ability to discover ideas no human may have thought to try.
As AI changes how we invent, and corporate structures dominate how we file, we have to ask: are we rewarding invention—or just good paperwork? The Innovators reminds us that behind every marquee name is often a web of collaborators left off the patent filing.
It’s time we reconsider not just who invented something, but how we honor the teams, tools, and systems that bring innovation to life.
#InnovationEconomy #PatentStrategy #TechPolicy #AIandIP #InventorsRights #FutureOfInnovation
As I delve into the fascinating realms of technology and science for our newsletter, I can't help but acknowledge the crucial role of seamless IT networks, efficient desktop environments, and effective cloud systems. This brings to light an important aspect of my work that I am proud to share with you all. Besides curating engaging content, I personally offer a range of IT services tailored to your unique needs. Be it solid desktop support, robust network solutions, or skilled cloud administration, I'm here to ensure you conquer your technological challenges with ease and confidence. My expertise is yours to command. Contact me at michael@conceptualtech.com.
Tech Topics is a newsletter with a focus on contemporary challenges and innovations in the workplace and the broader world of technology. Produced by Boston-based Conceptual Technology (http://www.conceptualtech.com), the articles explore various aspects of professional life, including workplace dynamics, evolving technological trends, job satisfaction, diversity and discrimination issues, and cybersecurity challenges. These themes reflect a keen interest in understanding and navigating the complexities of modern work environments and the ever-changing landscape of technology.
Tech Topics offers a multi-faceted view of the challenges and opportunities at the intersection of technology, work, and life. It prompts readers to think critically about how they interact with technology, both as professionals and as individuals. The publication encourages a holistic approach to understanding these challenges, emphasizing the need for balance, inclusivity, and sustainability in our rapidly changing world. As we navigate this landscape, the insights provided by these articles can serve as valuable guides in our quest to harmonize technology with the human experience.